Why I quit as a school librarian Progressive activism is now
considered the norm (by Nina Welsch)
I can’t pinpoint the exact moment I decided to quit
my post as an assistant librarian at a private school, but it was most probably
when Andersen Press defended its decision to
publish a book intended for under-sevens that contained illustrations of men in
fetish gear.
When I saw the book — Grandad’s Pride by
Harry Woodgate — on the senior librarian’s acquisitions spreadsheet, to be
ordered for June’s month-long Pride display, I quickly alerted them to the
scandal. Although, in truth, “scandal” was wishful embellishment on my part.
Other than a report on MailOnline, the book’s content didn’t
attract great interest in the mainstream media. On the contrary, Woodgate was
later a panellist at the Edinburgh International Book Festival, participating
in an event about diversity in children’s publishing. Very recently, the book
was longlisted for the Little Rebels prize,
an award that is “designed to recognise the rich tradition of radical
publishing for children in the UK”.
Grandad’s Pride isn’t
the only eyebrow-raising nomination I recognised from my time working as a children’s
librarian in Scotland. On the Little Rebels longlist was also L.D.
Lapinski’s Jamie, a novel I read in one incredulous sitting. It
tells the story of Jamie, a child of purposefully undisclosed sex who
identifies as non-binary and is faced with the “unjust” decision of whether
“they” attend all-boys or all-girls high school. As well as author Lapinski
(who identifies as non-binary) portraying Jamie in such a way that makes it
seem “they” have no birth sex, the book also contains a deliberate rewriting of
the Equality Act that obfuscates the reality of sex to young readers; Jamie
asserts “gender” is a protected characteristic under the law rather than “sex”
and “gender assignment”.
Grandad’s Pride was
the only book I was bold enough to flag, using the minor media coverage of the
controversy to present an objective case against adding it to the school
library collection. As much as I wanted to, I didn’t express my aversions
to Jamie or any of the other — at least 30 — fiction and
non-fiction children’s books steeped in unfalsifiable ideology I came across.
Why didn’t I speak out about them all? I’ll confess
some of it was timidity. In Scotland at the time, the Gender Recognition Reform
Bill was not yet defeated. Plus, I had little authority as the assistant
librarian. Within my small department, I was the only one who felt unease about
these resources. Perhaps the boiled-frog effect shocked me into stunned silence
too. In my first post-university job, in a public library in 2018, I’d
witnessed children as young as six being signed up to a summer reading
challenge where the form invited them to list their gender “girl”, “boy” or
“other”. Back then, it had seemed ridiculous, a brief blip in sanity — an
administrative error, even. That blip was now a hydra with heads sprouting
everywhere I looked.
This was the real problem. My fight was not with my
school library, it was with the whole library sector, and beyond this, the
entire world of children’s publishing and bookselling. Activists disguised as
children’s authors are not falling through the cracks of publishing — they are
being actively promoted and lionised by the industry. It’s extremely hard to
make the case that a book is deeply unsuitable for children when major bookshop
chains such as Waterstones are singing its praises on their website and media
reviews are glowing. Revered children’s authors such as Malorie Blackman and
Philip Pullman have lent their support to trans ideology; the few children’s
authors who have had the integrity to express concern, including Gillian
Philips and Rachel Rooney, have been hounded and cast out.
Not long before I left my library post last year, I
attended a webinar on the subject of censorship hosted by the School Library
Association (SLA). I had hoped for a robust discussion on censorship from all
angles, but there was a notable cognitive dissonance from the hosts. Much of
their focus was on the book-banning conflicts going on in US
school libraries, where the parents and authorities challenging
books were implicitly framed as Christian Right-wingers. Secular parents,
reluctant to expose their children to gender or critical race theory, were
conveniently grouped in with evangelicals trying to purge Judy Blume and Harry
Potter from library shelves. The same webinar also discreetly advised
librarians how to ensure they could justify why they might have chosen to
“weed” (remove) certain books: for instance, we were told that writing up an
(unofficial) library policy is a good way to safeguard against objectors.
Something that dawned on me during that meeting was
the demographic of modern school librarians, something I also observed at the
2023 annual conference for the Chartered Institute of Library and Information
Professionals (CILIP). Most were young, progressive women, and perhaps this
makes sense: consider the unique mixture of power and nurture librarianship
holds; especially in a school library, where you are revered as the moulder of
innocent minds, an ambassador for kindness and tolerance as much as literacy.
Librarians may not write the books but it is them (us) who decide what books to
display and promote, which authors get invited to give talks, and — almost as
important — who and what does not get platformed.
Another, perhaps unsurprising, factor in the rise
of activist librarianship is social media. Most schools and public libraries
have X or TikTok accounts (“Librarians of TikTok” has
posted almost 40 million times). A key part of a school librarian’s job is now
online PR to show that reading is not only a crucial life skill but also
“cool”. I’m not opposed to this: one of my favourite parts of the job was
designing funky, enticing book displays and murals to showcase the range of the
library collection. However, one of the best ways to get trending is to latch
onto viral hashtags and, given that every other day is #SomethingAwarenessDay
or someone’s day of “visibility”, the parts of the collection on show end up
being heavily steeped in DEI and LGBTQIA+. The old-fashioned image of the
librarian as an elderly, stern, technophobic, cardigan-wearer has changed
dramatically — the cardigans still exist, except they now come adorned with
pronoun badges and progressive slogans. And as with the worrying trends in
children’s publishing, none of this is considered radical, it’s simply the new
norm.
The flip side of questionable material being
marketed to children is the material being hidden from them. Barely 20 years
ago, a model librarian strained for utmost political neutrality. Their role was
to ensure the efficient and thorough provision of the information members of
the public wanted to access, not judgement of it. The 2005 intellectual freedom guidance issued
by CILIP stated this clearly: “[Works] should not be excluded on moral,
political, religious, racial or gender grounds, to satisfy the demands of
sectional interest.”
In contrast, a CILIP guide published in September
2023 about making a public libraries “safe and inclusive” is
notably less resolute in tone. There are references to protecting people from
(undefined) “hate speech” and “misinformation” as well as librarians “working
in a context of a highly polarised society”. With the best will in the world,
such nebulous guidance has given the green light to librarians with agendas to
act on biases with flimsy justification.
Evidently many are. Only last year, public libraries
in a West Yorkshire council area were revealed to have blacklisted a number of “gender-critical” books,
including Kathleen Stock’s Material Girls, and were hiding them in
stockrooms (they were later reinstated to the shelves but forbidden from being
“promoted” on displays). In parts of America, the war on intellectual
freedom has progressed from the front desk to
the catalogue, where content warnings and deeply biased subject tags
are added to databases, making it harder for citizens to access resources that
don’t pass the progressive smell test. As with so many cultural trends, it’s a
censorious aberration that could easily spread to the UK.
How can we defend against this? The road back to
common sense in children’s publishing will be a long and fraught one. But
describing the water in which we are drowning is a start. Libraries may be
renowned as spaces of quiet, but this is a silence that desperately needs
breaking.
Nina Welsch is a writer and former librarian.
Why I quit as a school librarian - UnHerd
No comments:
Post a Comment