Lauridsen: O magnum mysterium

The Research On Sexuality They Don't Want You to See - Michael Bailey | ...

 

Trans cyclist Emily Bridges: ‘elite sport is over for me’ (by Joan Smith)

 

Reality matters. No one is trying to ban trans women from sport at any level, from the Olympics to school sports days. All they’ve been told to do by some governing bodies is compete in the correct category for their sex. Yet trans athletes keep saying they’ve been excluded, claiming they’ve been banned from their chosen sport.

In the US, the male-bodied swimmer Lia Thomas is taking legal action in an attempt to be allowed to compete against women. In the UK, the cyclist Emily Bridges is threatening to do the same after British Cycling restricted entry to the female category to women. 

“Elite sport is over for me” is the headline ITV News has used for an interview with Bridges. “If we were allowed to compete, if I was allowed to compete, it would be a different conversation,” he claims, “but I can’t compete […] I can’t do something I used to love.’

Bridges is 6’2”, was born male and went through male puberty. Like Thomas, he towers over female athletes and his voice in interviews is that of a young man. He could go on racing for years if he were willing to compete in the male or “open” category, a point made by ITV’s sports editor, Steve Scott. 

Scott’s challenge goes to the heart of the matter, exposing the fact that there is no ban on trans athletes. But they want validation of their claimed gender identity, and they won’t get that in the “open” category. 

Unsurprisingly, Bridges has no answer to Scott’s question, appearing lost for words. “Would it be safe for me to compete in an open category?” he asks after a long pause. The answer is obviously yes, but trans athletes are not used to having their hyperbolic claims called out like this. 

The people who are at risk are girls and women who find themselves competing against individuals who are bigger, stronger and have greater muscle mass. Injuries have been reported in football and basketball after women found themselves playing against teams which included male-bodied trans women. Female athletes are also losing medals to trans-identified males. 

Bridges is now making even more absurd statements, however, such as the notion that protecting the female category in sport “has normalised the exclusion of trans people from public life”. He claims it’s made it “easier to ban us from toilets, easier to ban our healthcare […] and our ability to go out in public’. 

None of this is happening. Trans people are simply expected to observe boundaries put in place to protect women from men’s greater physical strength and male violence. These expectations are so reasonable that they weren’t even questioned until some men decided they were women, and started trying to take over single-sex spaces and categories. 

Obviously they don’t want to admit this, so they’ve played the victim card instead. “You leave the house and you’re thinking, am I going to come home?” Bridges suggests at the end of his latest interview.

It’s a thought most women have had at some point in their lives, with much greater justification. But women’s safety is the last thing on the minds of activists who think they should be able to do exactly what they like.

---

Joan Smith is a novelist and columnist. She has been Chair of the Mayor of London’s Violence Against Women and Girls Board since 2013. Her book Homegrown: How Domestic Violence Turns Men Into Terrorists was published in 2019.

Trans cyclist Emily Bridges: 'elite sport is over for me' - UnHerd

 

 

Friends of My Family Are Dead: Israel

The Insane Hypocrisy of Woke Activists - Peter Boghossian | heretics. 5

 

Germany weaponises new NGO bill against the Right (by Ralph Schoellhammer)

 

Who will defend democracy against democracy’s defenders? This might sound like a joke, but it should be taken seriously in Germany. For over a year the country’s Greens and Social Democrats have been pushing for a law that would create mandatory government support for NGOs that engage in “supporting democracy, creating diversity, preventing extremism, and enhancing political education”. 

On its surface, the law appears to be designed to ensure long-term funding for institutions outside of the government sector, but a closer look reveals that in its current form it would primarily support “progressive” causes. Left-of-centre NGOs would have a permanent advantage, and their public funding would be secured even with a conservative federal government in charge. 

At this point, the initiative by Left-wing members of Germany’s ruling coalition to force taxpayers to finance Left-wing NGOs is only being kept at bay by the smallest partner in government, the Free Democrats. The party continues to point out that creating a law which targets Right-wing extremism but remains silent on other forms of radicalism, such as Islamism, is insufficient and demonstrably partisan. 

This anti-democratic new law is not just a financial issue, but an attempt by the government to tilt the political playing field against anyone with Right-of-centre politics. Despite their hopes to the contrary, Chancellor Olaf Scholz and the Greens know that banning the Alternative for Germany (AfD) — which would be the main target of this new law — is not going to happen. As a result, they are trying to outsource the suppression of their opponents to civil society — ideally via selective funding for government-approved NGOs. 

Germany’s Minister for the Interior, Nancy Faeser, makes no secret of the intentions behind the law, saying that “no stone will remain unturned” in finding out who supports the New Right and that “those who mock the German state will feel the strength of the state”. The idea of making mockery of the government punishable by law, all in the name of “defending democracy”, is, to lean on a cliché, pretty Orwellian. What is the point of a liberal democracy if citizens are no longer permitted to criticise their politicians? Having led Germany down a path of sustained economic decline, the ruling coalition now wants to silence its opponents.

Faeser hopes to “discourage” support for Right-wing parties rather than punish it — for now, at least. Not even 24 hours ago a German bank refused to process an individual donation to the AfD, sending a letter to the person in question stating that the bank “does not engage in such transactions”. After this incident became public, the bank apologised and attributed the mistake “to human error”.

Trying to exclude those who have different views from public life, by way of a thinly veiled threat of debanking, is not democratic. Instead, it represents abandoning democracy for something closer to totalitarianism.

 Germany weaponises new NGO bill against the Right - UnHerd

 

This Muslim Israeli Woman Is the Future of the Middle East